Lasith Malinga
SrPlayerMInnWktsEcoAveSrRC
1Lasith Malinga (SL)1616255.3230.6434.56766
2Brett Lee (AUS)1515224.8026.8633.59591
3Jacques Kallis (SA)1717204.9326.2531.95525
4Daniel Vettori (NZ)1717183.6629.0047.56522
5Harbhajan Singh (IND)1313143.9735.4253.57496
6Chaminda Vaas (SL)1616183.9327.4441.89494
7Muttiah Muralitharan (SL)1717243.6120.1633.54484
8Ajit Agarkar (IND)1212115.3044.0049.82484
9Kyle Mills (NZ)1515284.2917.2524.11483
10Dwayne Bravo (WI)1515155.0132.0638.40481
11Shane Bond (NZ)1010175.1927.7632.12472
12James Anderson (ENG)1212214.5121.7628.95457
13Anil Kumble (IND)1010114.7140.2751.27443
14Shahid Afridi (PAK)1313144.3330.5042.29427
15Glenn McGrath (AUS)1212214.0419.6129.14412

Lasith Malinga: Leading Run Conceder

Sri Lankan bowler Lasith Malinga holds the record for most runs conceded in the ICC Champions Trophy. He played 16 matches, taking 25 wickets. Malinga conceded a total of 766 runs at an economy rate of 5.32.

His average stands at 30.64 with a strike rate of 34.56. Despite his high runs conceded, his wicket-taking ability remains notable. Malinga’s performances have often been a mix of brilliance and expense.

Brett Lee: Aggressive but Costly

Australian pacer Brett Lee is second on the list. He played 15 matches, picking up 22 wickets. Lee conceded 591 runs with an economy rate of 4.80.

He averaged 26.86 and had a strike rate of 33.59. Lee’s fast bowling often intimidated batsmen but came at a price. His aggressive approach sometimes resulted in high run concessions.

Jacques Kallis: A Balanced All-Rounder

Jacques Kallis of South Africa played 17 matches in the tournament. He managed to take 20 wickets while conceding 525 runs. His economy rate was a moderate 4.93.

Kallis maintained an average of 26.25 and a strike rate of 31.95. He was more economical compared to many other bowlers on this list. His all-round performance provided a good balance to his team.

Daniel Vettori: The Master of Economy

New Zealand’s Daniel Vettori bowled economically in his 17 matches. He took 18 wickets and conceded 522 runs at an impressive economy rate of 3.66. Vettori’s average was 29.00 with a high strike rate of 47.56.

He often controlled the game’s tempo. His slower bowling style proved difficult for batsmen. His effectiveness shone despite lower wicket counts.

Harbhajan Singh: The Indian Off-Spinner

Harbhajan Singh played 13 matches and conceded 496 runs. He secured 14 wickets at an economy rate of 3.97. His average stood at 35.42 with a strike rate of 53.57.

The off-spinner had a knack for bowling in pressure situations. He managed to contain runs effectively. However, his wicket-taking was limited in this tournament.

Chaminda Vaas: Consistent Performer

Sri Lankan bowler Chaminda Vaas was another consistent performer. He played 16 matches, took 18 wickets, and conceded 494 runs. His economy rate was a tidy 3.93.

Vaas maintained an average of 27.44 and a strike rate of 41.89. His disciplined bowling made him valuable. He was effective in keeping run rates under control.

Muttiah Muralitharan: The Spin Maestro

Legendary spinner Muttiah Muralitharan played 17 matches, taking 24 wickets. He conceded 484 runs with an impressive economy rate of 3.61. His average was 20.16, and his strike rate was 33.54.

Muralitharan’s spin was a nightmare for batsmen. He kept the runs low and wickets flowing. His record speaks volumes of his skill and consistency.

Ajit Agarkar: A Mixed Bag

Indian pacer Ajit Agarkar featured in 12 matches, conceding 484 runs. He picked up 11 wickets at an economy rate of 5.30. His average was 44.00 and his strike rate stood at 49.82.

Agarkar was often expensive. His performances were inconsistent. However, he occasionally delivered match-winning spells.

Kyle Mills: New Zealand’s Reliable Bowler

Kyle Mills from New Zealand played 15 matches, securing 28 wickets. He conceded 483 runs with a respectable economy rate of 4.29. His average was an outstanding 17.25, and his strike rate was 24.11.

Mills was a reliable bowler for his team. His ability to take wickets was crucial. He often provided early breakthroughs.

Dwayne Bravo: All-Round Efforts

West Indies’ Dwayne Bravo played 15 matches. He conceded 481 runs and took 15 wickets at an economy rate of 5.01. His average stood at 32.06 with a strike rate of 38.40.

Bravo was known for his all-round skills. His bowling was aggressive yet expensive. He contributed to both bowling and fielding.

Shane Bond: A Lethal Pace Bowler

New Zealand’s Shane Bond played 10 matches, taking 17 wickets. He conceded 472 runs at an economy rate of 5.19. His average was 27.76 with a strike rate of 32.12.

Bond’s raw pace made him a threat. He often struck fear into batsmen. However, he was sometimes costly in terms of runs.

James Anderson: England’s Swing King

James Anderson played 12 matches, picking up 21 wickets. He conceded 457 runs at an economy rate of 4.51. His average was 21.76, and his strike rate was 28.95.

Anderson’s swing bowling was effective. He maintained a good balance between wickets and runs. His performances were consistent and vital for his team.

Anil Kumble: The Indian Leg-Spinner

Veteran spinner Anil Kumble played 10 matches and conceded 443 runs. He took 11 wickets at an economy rate of 4.71. His average was 40.27, and his strike rate stood at 51.27.

Kumble’s leg-spin had moments of brilliance. He contained batsmen effectively. However, he struggled to take frequent wickets.

Shahid Afridi: The Aggressive All-Rounder

Pakistan’s Shahid Afridi played 13 matches, taking 14 wickets. He conceded 427 runs with an economy rate of 4.33. His average was 30.50, and his strike rate was 42.29.

Afridi was known for his explosive style. His bowling was both a strength and a weakness. He could change the game but was also expensive.

Glenn McGrath: The Australian Great

Legendary pacer Glenn McGrath played 12 matches, picking up 21 wickets. He conceded 412 runs at an impressive economy rate of 4.04. His average was 19.61 and his strike rate was 29.14.

McGrath’s precision was unmatched. He kept runs low while taking key wickets. His bowling was the epitome of accuracy.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *